Every few months, the New York Times Opinion section publishes the same piece about American higher education. The details change. The pastoral setting is different. The German sociologist cited at the emotional climax rotates. The architecture is invariant: catalog the genuine crises facing higher education in two paragraphs, pivot to a small and photogenic institution where none of these crises exist, extract a lesson that cowardly mainstream universities are too bureaucratic and compromised to apply, and recommend, with philosophical garnish, that Harvard consider mandatory dishwashing.

Frank Bruni, who draws a salary from Duke University while writing for the Times about the soul institutions like Duke have sacrificed, has now filed this piece twice: in April 2024, arguing that humility is what higher education has forgotten how to teach, and again in July 2025, concluding that "the corpus of college lumbers on, but some of its soul is missing." Both pieces were published in the Times. Both were written from inside a university whose endowment exceeds the GDP of several small nations.

Michal Leibowitz's May 20, 2026 guest essay, "A Cattle Ranch Is Doing What the Ivy League Can't," is the genre's fullest expression yet. Leibowitz, an editor at Times Opinion, visited Deep Springs College in the California desert, spoke to two dozen people, and returned to publish the piece in the section she helps edit.

Deep Springs College educates 26 students per year on a working cattle ranch. Students serve on the board of trustees, run admissions, staff a volunteer fire team, and clean infected wounds on dairy cows named Euclid. Leibowitz suggests this model contains important lessons for Yale.

This is like observing that North Korea has exceptionally high rates of civic unity and collective identity, and recommending that America adopt mandatory collective farming to solve its social trust crisis. The commune works! The residents are very committed to the institution! They have no choice.

Leibowitz interviewed, by her own count, roughly the same number of people as currently attend Deep Springs. Her sample is the institution. The institution is 26 people. The extrapolated policy recommendation: restructure American higher education.

The communal ownership and absence of AI cheating that Leibowitz admires at Deep Springs are properties of 26, not principles that scale to 2,600 let alone 26,000. They are also properties of any isolated community where everyone knows everyone, internet access is limited, and the professor grading your essay watched you write it. Disentangling "ownership ethos prevents cheating" from "remote cattle ranch prevents cheating" would require a comparison group. Leibowitz does not provide one. She provides a theory and Instagram-worthy photographs of desert mountains.

Read the byline again, slowly: Leibowitz "spoke to two dozen students, teachers and alumni and visited Deep Springs College."

A Times Opinion editor traveled to a California desert cattle ranch, frolicked in the mountains and amongst the livestock, and published the results in the section she edits, arguing that elite institutions need to make their students feel more responsible for something. The piece ran with landscape photographs of considerable beauty. Presumably someone approved this trip.

This is the structural condition of the genre.

The New York Times Opinion section recruits its staff almost exclusively from the elite universities it deploys its columnists to criticize. If the Times took its own advice seriously, it would replace a few Opinion editors with Deep Springs graduates. They would bring stronger communal values, a demonstrated commitment to collective labor, and two years of experience actually governing an institution.

They might also clean their own dishes.

The Leibowitz piece, like almost every piece in this genre, names real pathologies: grade inflation, student consumerism, the disappearance of communal obligation. These exist. What the genre systematically refuses to do is connect them to the structural force that produced them. When you finance a college education through personal debt rather than public investment, you produce exactly the transactional relationship with the institution that Leibowitz deplores. The student is a consumer because the system made her one.

Deep Springs is free. No tuition. No debt. The ownership ethos Leibowitz finds so moving becomes considerably less mysterious when students are not simultaneously calculating whether their credential will repay their loan.

The essay does not mention student debt once.

The Times will run this piece again. Different institution, different German philosopher, slightly different landscape photographs. The question institutional leaders should bring to it is not whether the praised institution is admirable. Deep Springs almost certainly is.

The question is why the people most insulated from higher education's structural realities: professors at elite universities, editors at the world's most elite newspaper, columnists who have never had to close a campus, refinance a bond, or explain a tuition increase to a board, are the ones most confidently producing the diagnosis.

And why the solution is always, at bottom, that somebody else should wash more dishes.

The Intelligence Council is a next-gen B2B media and business intelligence platform built for people who make strategy, allocate capital, and carry operating risk.

Higher Education Leadership Intelligence is for presidents, provosts, CIOs, and institutional decision-makers leading through enrollment, funding, and tech disruption.

This is one of our six education and learning-related publications spanning K-12, Higher Education, and Workforce. Our education newsletters reach tens of thousands of senior decision-makers across the U.S. and key international markets.

Ping us at [email protected] if you’d like to learn more, explore Enterprise Subscriptions, or would like to partner in other ways.